Feb 22, 2006 Summary of Week 5 - Complementarity with the Global Fund’s Key Partners. Feb.12- 19. Question of the week: What do you think the Global Fund should be doing to ensure that its work and that of its key partners complement each other? Lead Contributors (In no particular order): English Forum...

Mar 28, 2006 Key Contents from the English forum: Week 10 Question: What parts of the Global Fund’s financing model (including the rounds system and the Comprehensive Funding Policy) and the Global Fund’s architecture (including CCMs, PRs, LFAs and the TRP) might need to be examined to reduce transaction...

Saiki - Mar 22, 2006 To reduce transaction costs and improve coordination with global and local partners, these involve the Comprehensive Funding Policy and the use of one of the organisation's architecture in monitoring the activities of local partners i.e TRP. In addition, I would like to recommend...

vmarencop - Mar 20, 2006 Bureaucracy is the highest transaction cost developing countries pay; only second to corruption. But, can there be transparency without these structures in place? I strongly encourage to reduce protocols that local partners put in place, that consume too much time. These vary...

Luc Comhaire - Feb 17, 2006 Coordination structures exist on paper (CCM) but their functioning and practical effectiveness can be improved. Subjects concerning real problems faced by the programme in the field are rarely or never discussed. The GFATM, through the CCM could stimulate the establishment...