Feb 22, 2006 Summary of Week 5 - Complementarity with the Global Fund’s Key Partners. Feb.12- 19. Question of the week: What do you think the Global Fund should be doing to ensure that its work and that of its key partners complement each other? Lead Contributors (In no particular order): English Forum...

bacan - Feb 14, 2006 Shahid Mallick wrote: There is no doubt GF is contributing hugely towards HIV/AIDS and Malaria prevention. However, the fund should emerge from a bureaucratic system and build the capacities of at least some committed and ethical people to play its future roles, since money alone...

Feb 24, 2006 Message from Tom Mboya Okeyo , MoH- Kenya My contribution this week is a Case study on Kenya (powerpoint presentation available on request). It demonstrates that without the Global Fund, PEPFAR, MSF, Clinton Foundation, the number of people on ART in Kenya by end of January, 2006 would have...

Shola16 - Apr 22, 2006 In practice, government bureaucracy can delay and sometime frustrate plans and activities, especially in developing countries. Often, planners and policy makers continually make assumptions about what people at grassroots level think, but few programme implementers have bothered...

Mina - Mar 07, 2006 It would appear that the focus of GF activiites vis a vis the private sector and civil society has been primarily on global advocacy e.g. to support the work of the Fund e.g. increase funding available via the Fund and/or advocate for specific issues to be addressed e.g. orphans and...