In response to your question, we would like to provide you with the clarifications regarding the classification of your Round 8 HIV proposal. T he Global Fund ’s independent Technical Review Panel (TRP) has recommended to the Global Fund Board that Round 8 HIV proposal from your country be classified...

The report of the Technical Review Panel and the Secretariat On round 8 proposals states in paragraph 5 that there are 18 criteria used to assess proposals. In Appendix 1 in the terms of reference of the Technical Review Panel, there are 20 criteria. Are there 18 or 20? What are the criteria?

I would like to know how you have classified “portions of categories 1, 2 or 2b not recommended for funding". Are these portions category 3? If so, could we have the TRP comments for resubmission? Are they Category 4? If so, could we have the TRP comments? As such, the CCM feels that the large...

[quote user="Rada"]I would be interested in knowing more about the selection process and make-up of the Board, the Technical Review Panel and the Independent Appeal Panel. This would enable me to determine what powerful influences and factors/criteria are at work in making decisions concerning...

I would be interested in knowing more about the selection process and make-up of the Board, the Technical Review Panel and the Independent Appeal Panel. This would enable me to determine what powerful influences and factors/criteria are at work in making decisions concerning funding, etc. Any specific...