Browse by Tags
-
Feb 21, 2006 Contribution by Sammi Fredenburg Joined: 17 Jan 2006 Posts: 4 Location: Seattle, Washington USA Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:41 am Post subject: Re: Countries not meeting set targets( or level 3 indicators I can understand the frustration in regards to the protocol which delays the life-saving...
-
Feb 22, 2006 Summary of Week 5 - Complementarity with the Global Fund’s Key Partners. Feb.12- 19. Question of the week: What do you think the Global Fund should be doing to ensure that its work and that of its key partners complement each other? Lead Contributors (In no particular order): English Forum...
-
Stéphane P. ROUSSEAU - Feb 21, 2006 There is one particular body that have well proven to be paramount to the smooth running of the whole GF process – and yet – is not an integrated part of the in-country Global Fund architecture: that is the Technical Working Group (TWG). The latter being defined as...
-
Feb 27, 2006 Feb. 20-27 Discussion summary and lead contributors: improving grant performance Lead Contributors: (In no particular order) Grace Kyeyune (Uganda), Stéphane Rousseau (Philippines), Tom Mboya Okeyo (Kenya); Richard Carr, (Switzerland) Babacar Thiam (Senegal) Ashish Srivasta (India), Souleyman...
-
Mar 22, 2006 Lead Contributors and Summary: March 13-20; Having a positive effect on the market for essential health products: Lead Contributors: Ben Karenzi (Rwanda), Mohammed Jimoh (Nigeria), Rose Joshi (Nepal), Njei Moses Timah (Cameroon), Manuel Lluberas (FL, USA), Vanessa Marenco (DC, USA), Darren...
-
ccmindo - Apr 11, 2006 Views of Indonesia CCM and Technical Working Group Members Remy Rohadian – AusAID Indonesia In order to survive, GFATM might need to review the way they do business (eg from centralised to decentralised); improve M&E systems and implementation; inform the donors about the consequences...
-
Mar 28, 2006 Key Contents from the English forum: Week 10 Question: What parts of the Global Fund’s financing model (including the rounds system and the Comprehensive Funding Policy) and the Global Fund’s architecture (including CCMs, PRs, LFAs and the TRP) might need to be examined to reduce transaction...
-
Adelakun Adeseyoju Emma - Apr 11, 2006 Global Fund should oversee the implementation of all the proposed projects funded by them so as to ensure that the project is executed for the benefit of all the beneficiaries Adelakun Adeseyoju Renewed Hope Foundation Ondo State Nigeria
-
LPPrayas - Apr 11, 2006 Question: What is the most appropriate approach for the Global Fund to be involved in supporting health systems strengthening? We are engaged in different project works in many parts of our state which our NGO has taken-up time to time. Through our organization I am personally...
-
bhushana - Apr 11, 2006 I think approach (a) would be a good one to follow, because HSS (Health Systems Strengthening) is everyone's business. Approach (b) goes against this principle and sounds almost like shrugging the responsibility of the disease programmes on to others. Approach (a) would also...
|