09-10-2008 9:55 AM
|
-
ASHISH SRIVASTAVA
 -
India
Consultant
- Posts 185
|
To e-Forum( Civil-society as a Principal Recipient),
In selection of CSO as a principal recipient & subrecipient,CCM should consider basic GF's CSO framework Public/ private /Academic & research /Multi& bilateral organisation)&its linkage with state/ national plan,governance policies& procedures.In identification of PR& subrecipient,country CCM structure should be more comprehensive& responsive to all national stakeholders.CCM should consult with various stakeholder,LFA,linkage,CSS,& GF secretariat in identification &selection of civil-society organisation as a principal recipient.From GF standpoint, number of CCM models i.e. public sector/ multisector/ NGO/ FBO/ non health/private,single recipient,civil-society/UNDP/multilateral/South African,are functioning in different regions& countries,only South African CCM model consists of state participation. "Are these models constitutionally, financially, technically,scientifically& appropriately resourced & equipped in country partnership,&selection of specific civi-society as a principal recipient ." this question could give answer of CCM linkage with civil-society structure responsibilities,priorities& partnership. If GFATM(CCM) selects civi-society as a principal recipient than specific civil-society should consist of financial instruments, distribution of funding at country & state level,local NGO level, with expenditure objectives,standard allocation pattern,capacity of general equilibrium analysis with country economic& GDP growth. Civil-society should have provision of disbursal of funding according to socio-economic coverage,various sectors partnership with(trade/tourism/agriculture/industry(construction,mining pharmaceuticals,chemical,scientific& capital goods)education) could scale up CSO activity. GF could give better support to CSO in establishment of socio-economic framework,financial instrument&arrangement framework in countries.
If CSO does consider inclusion of expertise enterprize resources structure than its functioning should include all components of
grants recipients.
CS-------->CSO(PR)ENTERPRIZE----------->Govt.agencies ------------>private sectors ------------>NGO ------------>FBO social responsibilities ------------>professional association/ academic/research ------------ >Secretariat ------------->LFA ------------->affected population(CSS/CBO) ------------->stakeholder proposals ------------->multi/bi-lateral organisation ------------->industrial social responsibilities ------------->trade social responsibilities ------------->financial products ------------->civil-distribution of channel
CCM could choose above mentioned CSO(PR)ENTERPRIZE structure for effective implementation of GF mechanism.
Thanking you,
ASHISH SRIVASTAVA
ex-International Marketing
(SEAR-INDIA)81237
|
|
Page 1 of 1 (1 items)
|