EspañolFrançaisРусский
   
 
 
   
 
 
in
 
   

Dual Tracking Finance Mechanism
Page 1 of 1 (2 Items)
Sort Posts:
  • 06-18-2008 3:09 PM

    Re: Dual Tracking Finance Mechanism

    Dear Sanveej Kumar,

    Thank you for your message.

    In response to your enquiry we note the following points: 

    1. As explained in section 2.2.4 of the Round 8 Guidelines for proposals and in the Round 8 Fact Sheet on Dual Track Financing, Dual Track Financing (DTF) is the Global Fund’s recommendation that applicants routinely include a Principal Recipient from both the government and non-government sectors in each disease proposal (and not each sub-activity).
    2. DTF is a recommendation and not a mandatory requirement in Round 8, as it is recognized that it may not be possible in all settings. 
       
    3. In situations where it is not possible to include DTF in one disease proposal, applicants are requested to summarize the reasons why DTF is not included, in section 2.2.6 of the Proposal Form.
    4. It is possible for a government institution to be sub-recipient of a non-government PR. We encourage you to look at examples of Round 7 Proposals available on our website.
    5. During its review the TRP will assess implementation arrangements including the described capacity of the nominated PRs to manage additional funding and implement the program. We encourage you to look at sections 2.2.4 and 4.9 and Annex 2 of the Round 8 Guidelines for more information regarding PR capacities and TRP review criteria.

    We hope this information is helpful.

    Please do not hesitate to contact us should you have any further enquiry.

    Yours sincerely,
     
    Country Proposals
  • 06-17-2008 6:10 AM

    Dual Tracking Finance Mechanism

    Dear Forum,
     
    It is clear that the dual tracking finance mechanim is added to ensure that the "govt" systems do not take away all the lead and civil society is given somewhat equal footing (atleast theoretically) for the opportunity to be aprt of an effective response. But We are facing couple of problems here.
     
    One, if there are four subcomponents of HIV country proposal, in one subcomponent of a HIV proposal there is an CSO component and in other subcomponent there are none, will this be seen on an overall basis and concluded that the county has cleared the dual track financing criteria by having a CSO partner? Even if the other sub components which are distinct have no CSO partner.
     
    Second if there are two partners/contenders in one sub component proposal - one govt ministry and the other a CSO consortium- both can vie to be the PR. But in practice do you think it is possible for a govt dept /ministry to accept an SR or even a co PR position?
     
    Third, is it ever possible that the TRP at Geneva level can come back and say the Govt co PR proposal is not good enough and should be either shot down or merged with the Cop of CSO proposal?
     
    Please enlighten us with the Dual Track finance mechnism a bit more.
     
    Thanks Sanjeev Kumar
    Consultant
    New Delhi, India
Page 1 of 1 (2 Items)



© 2002 - 2008 The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. All Rights Reserved. About this site | Legal