One of the mistakes of the past that continue into today is the "use" of the phrase "bottom up approach" but not its "application."
Many developmental programmes have been donour driven. At local country level, development programmes of villages and communities have been driven, planned and proposed by members of the communities that are educated, can write proposals etc but usually either do not live in the villages with the communities or if they live in the villages with the communities, have interests outside the communities.
In any development programme proposal funding, funding has to include 'empowerment' and the building of capacity in the village communities themselves so that they understand what is required in the writing of proposals. preparation of budgets etc, etc
Why this is necessary is that, many of the development needs have been denied because of the strong donour driven agenda that is supported by the input of people that are not subject or direct beneficiaries of the development programme.
When these happens, the supposed "beneficiaries" of the development shifts to elsewhere and there is in fact no development for the needy remains needy and all the funds allocated fro that programme achieves nothing altogether.
A very good example in Fiji was the Affirmative Action Programme which was targeting the poor and those that want to start businesses at samll scale level. Unfortunately, the existing market took over the programme and any espiring business person failed as the established business denied them entry through some cunning use of the programme
Development programmes should be focused on the beneficiary and the donour and proposal writer and implementers should work with the intended beneficiaries all the time monitoring and reveiwing them all the time
Laitia