05-21-2008 8:39 AM
|
-
serenc

-
South Africa
Not currently affiliated with the Global Fund
- Posts 1
|
Re: Week 1: Capacity necessary for program scale-up
I would say that the most critical challenge remains that of human resources. There are a few dimensions to this:
1. Increasing supply
In many countries, including my own, the supply of health workers (doctors, nurses, pharmacists etc.) has decreased over the last 10-15 years, rather than increase. Governments need to devote more of their financial resources to increase the output of professional health workers.
2. Retention
We need to find better ways of retaining health workers. It will not help us to produce more health workers through our medical and nursing schools, but then immediately lose them to lucrative contracts in the developed world. Salaries in the public sector will never match that of the private sector, but there are many non-financial incentives at our disposal that is not being utilised adequately. This would include things such as investing more in the physical infrastructure and equipment at the disposal of health workers.
3. Management Skills
There is insufficient focus on building the management capacity of health workers at all levels - we tend to focus on building clinical skills, and forgetting about the essential management skills (core and soft skills). This includes the all-important planning and budgeting skills - too many examples abound of poor service delivery as a result of poor budget planning.
4. Information
One of the essentials of scaling up is knowing where you are, and where you need to go, and then knowing if you ge there! Information is key in this. There is insufficient investment in health management information systems - though in many cases there is a lot of effort on data input, but very little on how to use and analyse the data provided so that it could move from data to information!
Of course there are many challenges and impediments to scale-up, but these would be some of the must critical, in my mind.
|
|
05-20-2008 12:44 PM
|
-
Michael Ngaara

-
South Africa
Local Fund Agent (LFA)
- Posts 3
|
Re: Week 1: Capacity necessary for program scale-up
In Southern Africa one of the greatest constraints is "warm bodies" to deliver public health services. A lot has been written on how the demand far outstrips supply. Recruitment and retention of public healthcare service providers is a major challenge for virtually all countries in the region.
These countries are attempting to respond by engaging more community based health care workers, who may or may not be fully trained nurses etc. There is little else that can be done at that level, as it appears that the whole world is short of trained nurses.
However there is a lot of inefficiency in the management of such skills as exist. This perhaps is where more focus can yield substantial results. Such focus can be achieved by various measures such as introducing business style project management skills in the public service (not just limited to healthcare). This obviously requires different kinds of training and higher levels of committment and support by the employers.
Efficiency can also be aided by greater harmonisation between the various donors, the Global Fund included. Unfortunately despite officially subscribing to principles of harmonisation the Global Fund sometimes does the precise opposite, resulting in parallel projects. Despite having worked with the Global Fund for a number of years I cannot understand why its officers bluntly refuse to have combined workplans for activities that are also funded by other donors.
|
|
05-20-2008 12:28 PM
|
-
hassan cherry

-
Lebanon
Not currently affiliated with the Global Fund
- Posts 4
|
Re: Week 1: Capacity necessary for program scale-up
First of all, the situation in Lebanon is a little bit different to other Arab countries concerning the access to treatment for PLHIV and other services that the government should provide to them..
by example, the ministry of public health should provide three lines of ARVs but because of the bad political and security situation (and other conflicts between the Lebanese politicians and parties), the ministry of finance doesn't give the allowances to the ministry of health to buy the medicines which causes, for several times during the year,a discontinuation of medications, like a discontinuation of one of the 3 medicines or more, that's why the support group for PLHIV in SIDC association used to provide and buy the missed medicine and used to write letters for the minister of health and the NAP manager to accelerate and speed up the procedures to get the medications...
in addition to that, PLHIV in Lebanon are obliged to cover the cost of their medical exams (CD4 and Viral Load), and they try to implement activities to cover the cost of the medical exams.
wherefore, SIDC used to let PLHIV participate in prevention and advocacy activities that are implemented to let them be more involved and leaders in preparing, execution and even evaluation... and i think, it is very important to let PLHIV be the main partner in each project and programs aims to focus on prvention, advocacy and other issues related to HIV/AIDS..
when i participated to the regional meeting of the global fund last February in Tunis, i talked about the eligibility and the criteria to get funds and to be a partner (or friend- global fund friends) of the global fund, because PLHIV in Lebanon need support (technical and financial) even that the government says that Lebanon is a middle/high income country and this is not true (just to get loans from international level and to convince the donors that they can give back money for economic reasons) instead of getting grants from international organization like global fund for social and health purpose like HIV/AIDS and Tuberculoses..
|
|
05-20-2008 11:18 AM
|
-
Sparrow Ministries

-
South Africa
Not currently affiliated with the Global Fund
- Posts 4
|
Re: Week 1: Capacity necessary for program scale-up
What Baganda wrote is true.
In our Health Services there is no long-term care for terminally ill adults and children and as a Hospice this is what we do. Also, not enough people are being educated and trained in Counselling, Education and Care of children (OVC) in the communities and the NPO's are doing this work without much assistance from the Government.
We are relaint on the private sector for funding as our Budget is R16 million per annum. Besides the Hospices (we run two) we have an Outreach program reaching 116 organisations who recived little or no assistance to care for the sick and Orphans in their communities (over 10 000 children and adults). We provide food parcels, clothing, funeral cost assiatnec and provide Home Based Care Training and support Granny projects for the Orphans.
I feel that the Global Fund should deal direct with the NPO's (NGO'S) doing all the work on HIV/AIDS.
As an NGO caring for over 10 000 HIV/AIDS children and adults for 16 years we are in dire need of assistance due to lack of funding from Government where we in the case of the children (majority HIV). Many only receive ARV if the CD4 account is below 200 again we buy and supply. We pay for First World Medications due to the lack of these at the Public Hospitals.
Capacity building is to help the people on the ground doing all the work to keep these people well and educate and care for the Children of our future making our Country a better one as people get well here at our Village we send them for Skills training with the hope that they will get jobs.
Global Fund should also distribute funds to the NGO'S on the ground where we should make our own applications such as US AIDS (PEPFAR).
2.5 million people died in South Africa in the last year from AIDS and AIDS related diseases.
Dawn Bell
Sparrow Ministries
|
|
05-20-2008 10:45 AM
|
-
Baganda

-
Uganda
Consultant
- Posts 8
|
Re: Week 1: Capacity necessary for program scale-up
The discussion below is about factors in terms of capacity that prevent adequate scale-up to meet demand, and what could the Global Fund and/or its partners could do to overcome them.
The ever increasing corruption in developing countries hinder the scaling up of demand, when there is corruption capacity can not built properly because most of the funds can not reach the intended recipients. In order to solve this problem the global fund should consider dealing directly with NGO rather working through coordinating mechanisms which are entangled with corruption in governments.
The ramshackled health systems in developing countries are another factor that prevents scaling up demand. The global funds appear as drop in the ocean because health care is highly under funded; therefore the ministries of health are not well facilitated and therefore can not implement global funds programmes effectively.
The global fund should compel governments to increase funding in the health care institutions. This should act as a pre-condition for the global fund recipients. The global fund should set aside funds for research as well epidemiological studies in the recipient countries. The studies should tailored on funded programmes. The periodical reports on best the global fund programmes could be funded. These kinds of discussions should also be strengthened in order to get the first hand information.
|
|
05-19-2008 11:31 PM
|
-
dolores

-
Solomon Islands
Country Coordinating Mechanism (CCM)
- Posts 3
|
Re: Week 1: Capacity necessary for program scale-up
For a small nation with limited infrastructure and human resources, it is simple. The structure and systems are there but managers are not putting into practice themselves and therefore no expectations on staff and no regular monitoring. Yes we do have limited capacity and skills but if individuals and organisations are provided hands on mentoring support and regular guidance and monitoring to strengthen the governance systems then programs should be able to deliver and reach even the most isolated communities. Our country comes under a lot of pressure from external 'experts' who come in, do their own thing and leave the country with no skills transfer at all. They prefer to drain the ideas and plans of the national staff, criticise the good work that is happening on the ground and go back and raise their flags for their own benefit and come up with quite often unrealistic recommendations (they are also in positions who can influence the donors on which way things should work for countries). Most times, we don't even get to see the report from the visit, unless we persistently follow up. Approaches as such ruin coordination efforts and capacity building plans in countries.
To be able to scale up programs, the need to engage with wider stakeholders becomes a move in the right direction. But to be able to get them involved, the first step to look at is the GF application forms and the bureaucratic process. From experience Community based organisations and hospitals in the smaller and outer lying islands lose out due to the formats we are using for GF and therefore only the elite organisations get through. We currently have a program which is similar to the community strengthening component for the R8 proposal and targets those organisations who consistently lose out from this process. There are huge challenges and risks involved and very slow evidence of impact, however, it is very rewarding to see organisations whom you have been able to support grow into organisations or government departments who are able to access and manage their own funding in 3 to 4 years.....yes, it takes that long, changes do not happen overnight.
|
|
05-19-2008 5:42 PM
|
-
tracey

-
Bangladesh
Not currently affiliated with the Global Fund
- Posts 1
|
Re: Week 1: Capacity necessary for program scale-up
Perhaps, one of our greatest challenges in scale up has been rational capacity building in accordance with the cascade effect.
We knew that in general our intervention was sought outside of the public health sector; however, from the beginning we worked closely with the public health sector, and they partnered with us until today. Our early attempt to go directly to community health workers did not prove as successful as we would have liked. They were not motivated to deliver and the consumers did not seek our intervention from them. To that end, a service that would generally be sought by drug vendors or unlicensed providers first had to be introduced through the public sector to include physicians and paramedics and through the mass media before the intervention would be trusted and adopted by the informal sector.
I think for any capacity building for scale up, you need to identify your channels of inlfuence--to include the consumers of services. It is wise to test the motivation and the acceptability of your target providers, but it is important to know that you might have to take the long way home to achieve the desired results.
Also it is important to recognize that in addition to the capacity of the providers who will deliver the intervention, the capacity of the researchers and trainers engaged in the scale up must be considered and improved, if necessary. Translating knowledge into action on a large scale is deceptively simple. However, a true scale up requires more research and strategizing across the framework of the health system--and to approach this, the players need strong analytical skills. Thus, the investment in capacity building among researchers in low resource settings may be just as important as capacity building among service providers.
Tracey Perez Koehlmoos, PhD, MHA
Head, Health and Family Planning Systems Programme
ICDDR,B
|
|
05-19-2008 2:01 PM
|
-
Elfatih Mohamed Malik

-
Sudan
Country Coordinating Mechanism (CCM)
- Posts 2
|
Re: Week 1: Capacity necessary for program scale-up
The answer in its simplist form is: weak district health system is a major issue to be addressed.
capacity development could be by:
1. more investment in training with a clear retention policy
2. national and mid-level is to work through district rather tahn to work on behalf of them.
3. Streamlining of all resources (local, national and international) towards the district...ie if you have a functioning district that means you will get more resources.
Dr Elfatih Mohamed Malik (MD
(work as Internal consultant for R7 - malaria component in Sudan, previously act as national coordinator for NMCP)
Director, Communicable Diseases Control
Federal Ministry of Health
Khartoum, Sudan
e.mail: fatihmmalik@hotmail.com
Office: +249 183 776269
Mobile: +249 122 165 202
|
|
05-19-2008 11:16 AM
|
-
Info

-
Switzerland
Global Fund Secretariat
- Posts 713
|
Week 1: Capacity necessary for program scale-up
Your answer could include (but does not have to be limited to): challenges that countries face with their health systems/infrastructure, such as management and coordination of services;availability, skills and motivation of health workers; procurement and distribution systems. You may also want to provide suggestions on what the Global Fund and/or other partners could do to support long-term capacity development.
References:
- Round 8 Guidelines [700kb]. Annex 3 to these guidelinesprovides examples on the types of activities/interventions that may be included in proposals relevant to the three diseases. These interventions include, but are not limited to, community systems strengthening initiatives to support increased quality and coverage of services to key affected populations. It also includes information on the 'six WHO building blocks' for health systems strengthening (which may be relevant to program level interventions [in s.4.5.] or HSS cross-cutting interventions [in s.4B.] of the Proposal Form).
- FAQ Round 8 [300kb], questions 63 to 66 on HSS.
|
|
|